Saturday, October 30, 1971 (Midnight): Chamber of Horrors aka Die Tur Mit Den 7 Schlossern (1962) / Doctor X (1932)

Synopsis: In London, a priest is poisoned while drinking a soda at a concession stand.  That same day, another man in the city is murdered, also under mysterious circumstances.  Each of the men carried an unusual looking key on a long gold chain. Later, police inspector Richard Martin (Heinz Drache) is visited by talkative safecracker Pheeny (Klaus Kinski) who tells him that someone tried to hire him to open a mysterious door with seven locks.  Pheeny, sensing that this is the sort of job that doesn’t end with a paycheck but with a bullet in the back of the head, backs out of the deal and tells the whole story, asking for Martin’s protection.  Pheeny, however, soon ends up dead.

Martin’s only clue comes in the form of a piece of paper that bears a coat of arms.  He visits a library; the librarian frostily informs him that it might take months or years to track down a particular coat of arms.  However, when the woman sees it, she instantly knows to whose family the coat of arms belongs. By an astounding coincidence it is the coat of arms of the librarian’s own family, the Selfords; and in fact the young woman, Sybil (Sabina Sesselmann), is herself one of the heirs of the Selford estate.  This turns out to be quite useful, as it soon becomes clear that each of the Selford heirs is being systematically targeted for murder.

It happens that the dispostion of the Selford estate is a hot topic at this particular moment.  The primary heir to the Selford fortune is soon to reach the age of majority, and all other heirs to the estate will receive their share of the fortune at the same time.  No one seems to have seen the heir lately, but the family’s attorney Mr. Haveloc (Hans Nielsen) says that he is abroad and that he himself has had to send frequent letters of credit to cover the heir’s gambling debts and hotel-trashing bills.

Martin, assisted by the comical police detective Holms, proceeds to the Selford mansion, where he must contend with the mysterious Dr. Antonio Stiletti (Pinkas Braun), a scientist in the Bela Lugosi vein, who keeps an ape in a cage down in the basement, and whose sinister experiments have yielded a monstrous assistant named Jacko, who is ready to kill at Dr. Selford’s command….

Comments: For our first feature tonight we get a rare treat: a krimi film from the early 1960s.  Krimis were West German crime films produced by the Danish studio Rialto, and based on the novels of Edgar Wallace.  Rialto made an impressive number of these films through the 1960s. They tended to have the same actors pop up again and again (Klaus Kinski played low-life criminals in many of them, including this one) They are mostly forgotten now, though they do enjoy something of a cult following. They sport their own unique look and sensibility; and The Door With Seven Locks (released stateside as Chamber of Horrors) is a good introduction to this subgenre.

Krimi films are fast-paced and pleasant enough to watch, but you shouldn’t spend a lot of time trying to make sense of them; it just spoils the fun (it might occur to you, for example, that a door with seven locks can be defeated by any punk with a set of lock picks; it would just take him seven times as long — but never mind that).

 The novel’s already overloaded plot is burdened with even more improbable twists and turns and red herrings. These films have an odd sense of humor, too —  as though you’re watching The Usual Suspects as directed by Richard Lester. Inspector Martin is an engaging, light-hearted fellow who is constantly doing magic tricks.  His assistant, detective Holms, is always providing unnecessary information (one murder victim’s name is Livingstone; Holms feels duty-bound to report that it isn’t the famous African explorer).  And Dr. Stiletti is a Bela Lugosi-esque nut who is interested in building a race of supermen; his first attempt yields a Tor Johnson-esque brute who lumbers around, carrying out his sinister instructions. Stiletti’s plan to place the head of a man on an ape’s body speaks to the same eclectic portfolio of a Lugosi villain, as well.

There is an agreeable wackiness to the proceedings, and as a mystery-horror hybrid this ones works pretty well.  Chamber of Horrors is also, at nine years old, the “newest” film we’ve seen on the show thus far.

Doctor X

Synopsis: A vicious serial killer is on the loose in New York, a cannibal who only strikes when the Moon is full. The police realize that all of the murders are centered around the medical academy run by Dr. Xavier (Lionel Atwill), and the cops recruit Dr. Xavier to help find which of the four eccentric surgeons in his employ might be the murderer.

As it turns out, all four of the doctors make pretty good suspects.  We have the sour Dr. Wells, who has studied the practices of cannibals; Dr Duke, whom we may or may not rule out because he is in a wheelchair but who is kind of a jerk anyway; Dr. Rowitz, a researcher of a more lyrical bent (he writes poetry); and Dr. Haines, who seems to be hiding a number of secrets, including a penchant for lad magazines.  Oh, and he might have taken a nibble or two of human flesh in his day.

Meanwhile, newspaper reporter Lee Taylor  (Lee Tracy) is trying to scoop the competition in getting the facts of the case, and he isn’t above posing as a corpse in the city morgue to get access.  Along the way he falls for Dr. Xavier’s daughter Joanne (Fay Wray).  But as Dr. Xavier hatches a plan to catch the man dubbed the “Moon Killer” by the papers, Lee also has to face the possibility that the killer may be none other than Dr. Xavier himself…

Comments: This Michael Curtiz thriller was shot not long after Universal hit box office gold with “Dracula” and “Frankenstein”.  As popular as these two films were with the public, they were regarded with great suspicion by the various self-appointed guardians of public morals, which saw them both — particularly the latter  — as unnecessarily ghoulish (Hollywood would soon create its own guardian of public morals in the form of the Hayes Office). Perhaps because of this, Doctor X  is surprisingly light-hearted in tone, considering the subject matter; and the male lead is even more of a goofball than the reporter Wallace Ford played in Night of Terror.

Doctor X was one of a number of early sound-era films shot in two-strip Technicolor, which theoretically makes this the first color film to be shown on Horror Incorporated. However, I am dead certain that the print shown on Channel 5 the night of October 30, 1971 would have been black-and-white.  To my knowledge no color 16mm prints were ever struck for this feature; in fact, most of the 35mm prints made after the original release of Doctor X were in black-and-white.  Luckily, the current DVD version is taken from UCLA’s restored archival print, so we can see what audiences in 1932 saw.

Color does wonders for this film. It brings life to the lavish art-deco sets and seems to deepen the overall depth of field. The two-strip process also lends an unusual, desaturated color palate to the film, with very strong greens and browns but the vibrant “hot”  colors we associate with the later Technicolor — reds, oranges and yellows — quite muted by comparison.

It’s great to see Lionel Atwill working on a good film while his career was still on the upswing.  Doctor X was released about a year before Secret of the Blue Room, another of his good early roles. But he’s better served in this film because his daughter is not played by the simpering Gloria Stuart, but the radiant Fay Wray, one of the greatest film talents of the early 1930s. It’s unfortunate that Wray’s career faded so quickly — but she gives a luminous and memorable performance here.


Advertisements

5 comments

  1. CHAMBER OF HORRORS was the American release title for the original 1940 British version, THE DOOR WITH SEVEN LOCKS, which starred Lilli Palmer and Leslie Banks (THE MOST DANGEROUS GAME). Lee Tracy had scored a hit a year earlier in THE FRONT PAGE, but he's way too grating here, apart from spending time on the beach with Fay Wray in a fetching bathing suit. She certainly has more to do in this film than she did in both MYSTERY OF THE WAX MUSEUM and THE VAMPIRE BAT.

    Like

  2. Dear Mike, I am nearly positive The Chamber of Horrors was 1940 version here.. I remember clearly kstp mixing up the sequence of reels making this mystery extra hard to follow. J.G.

    Liked by 1 person

    • Aha!

      I go by the year and the actors that were referenced in the newspaper listings. In May of 1972 the show broadcast CHAMBER OF HORRORS again, this time (according to the TV listings) the 1966 version! This seemed unlikely to me at the time, so I wrote the following:

      “Before we dive into this cinematic oddity, I need to make a small confession. I don’t always have 100% confidence that the movie listed in the newspaper is the same movie that was broadcast on Horror Incorporated.

      “Last-minute substitutions were always a possibility, and without any actual records from the television station itself there’s no way for me to independently verify what was broadcast. Fortunately for us, out-and-out substitutions occurred very infrequently and we can be fairly certain that a movie called Chamber of Horrors played on the night of Saturday, May 27, 1972.

      “The problem is that there are a number of movies with the title Chamber of Horrors; and the TV station itself didn’t write the description that appeared in the newspaper. Newspapers in those days (and even these days, I suppose) subscribed to a TV listing service. These services gave one-sentence descriptions of movies and TV episodes that newspapers could plug in to their daily schedule. It’s a system that works pretty well, assuming the description you have at hand is for the right movie. But if Horror Incorporated played the 1940 movie with that title, or the 1962 movie with that title (as they did previously), we will never know.”

      I will accept your memories of the actual broadcast over the TV listing, JG, so I’ll update the post with the correct movie when I get a chance. Thanks and please let me know if you spot any other errors.

      Like

  3. Believe me I remember this era real well. The TV guide was usually correct but sometimes you had to check the paper for last minute changes. Sometimes they would show one with no listing! On Fridays. Not meant to critique you’re doing a great thing. But i do remember falling down laughing with my mom this night because reel no 3 was shown before reel no 2. Thanks

    Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s